Issue 469: A phrase of every property of every extension

Starting Date: 
Working Group: 

In the 45th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 38th FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig reviewed the HW by GH on the issue 400 and among the others agreed to start a new issue on how to phrase that for every property of every extension of the CRM, there either exists a CRMbase property, which they are subproperties of or there doesn’t.

Heraklion, October 2019

    Current Proposal: 

    Posted by Christian Emil on 13/2/2020

    I have done this for CRMinf, CRMsci and CRMarcheo on the plane to Geneva. I attach the draft and if it is ok, I can take the rest as well.

    I will also add a column for subproperties in CRmbase. 

    Posted  by Christian Emil on 14/2/2020

    Dear all,

    Sorry for spamming you. My email system sent the mail before I wanted.

    I worked through

     CRMinf, CRMsci,  CRMarcheo, CRMgeo, CRMdig, CRMba, CRMtex, CRMsoc, FRBRoo, PRESSoo

    I didn't find LRMoo.

    The attached spreadsheet contains the results. I didn’t convert FRBRoo and PRESSoo into the common schema.



    CRMgeo:  no CRMbase properties. To be reviewed?

     CRMdig: Strange property ‘label’, should be reviewed, class and property hierarchies should be added.

     CRMba: No crmbase superproperties mentioned, should be reviewed

     CRMtex: Only one crmbase superproperty, more?

     CRMsoc: just a draft

     FRBRoo: many properties without crmbase superproperties

     PRESSoo : ok, with respect to FRBRoo.

    Posted by Christian Emil on 20/2/2020

    Dear all,

    Here is an updated version of the excel file with the overview of the super properties. I have included LRMoo. 

    I worked through

     CRMinf, CRMsci,  CRMarcheo, CRMgeo, CRMdig, CRMba, CRMtex, CRMsoc, LRMoo, FRBRoo, PRESSoo